Community of Scrum Gathering, Orlando 2010

Sights, sounds, convos from people at the conference 

Agile 2010 Highlights and Interviews

Filed under  //   video  
Posted by Gerry Kirk 

Comments [0]

Capacity-building in FourYearsGo

I keep thinking that an undertaking like FourYearsGo would include all of the following capacity-building functions (among others):
 
a.  Means to develop a common theme, goal or agenda that all members/allies can support.  This taps the power of collective orientation and action (the principle underlying armies, unions, coalitions, etc.).  Various voting methods, consensus processes, "theme teams", and collaborative document creation methods like Synanim are among the many approaches for accomplishing this. 

b.  Means to support people taking responsibility for what they love.  This taps the power of individual and group passion (the principle underlying parenting, self-directed learning, free market entrepreneurship, etc.).  Open Space conferencing ("unconferencing") is one approach to doing this, as are various forms of "support group", and clarification exercises like Appreciative Inquiry.

c.  Means for individuals and groups to find and interact with relevant others, ideas, projects, etc.  This taps the power of networking and collaboration (the principle underlying higher education, the internet, job fairs, etc.).  Open Space and online social software, networking and collaboration tools do this.

d.  Means for any and all involved to continually digest their individual and collective experience and exercise their individual and collective creativity and intelligence.  This taps the power of co-evolution (the principle underlying retreats, scientific research, blogging, etc.).  World Cafe and Maestro conferencing are simple, powerful forms for this, but there are dozens of others, usually involving on-line and/or face-to-face conversations, although wikis can also be used this way.

Note that each of these is "high leverage", tapping into some "free" source of life energy, some power source that requires little input energy to generate considerable output.  The overall approach is to free up or support energies that already exist in more or less constrained form or latent potential which, if simply aligned with or given access to other sources of energy, suddenly flow more powerfully.  Similar to permaculture and aikido, the organizer / gardener / change agent is acting as a facilitator, catalyst, or enabler, rather than a manager or controller.  Ideally, any such systems created are designed for self-organized responsiveness, so that there is a capacity for ongoing mutual adjustment (co-evolution) to maintain a level of potent appropriateness to (and thus success with) new challenges, changing involvement, emerging opportunities, etc.

These are only four major dimensions of such capacity-building.  Others may well exist.  But they share a perspective beyond "Let's get these folks to do X."  It is more like "Where is there stuck energy or latent potential in this community/system which, if we could but provide a space for it to awaken as part of a larger whole, would suddenly come to life on its own accord?" and "What is the right design for that 'space' -- the right framing, process, forum, software, whatever...?"

Thousands of people have ways to do this.  So we face these same issues at the meta-level:  How can we organize our initial conversations, reflections, interactions such that people with particular passions about how to "catalyze the movement" or "increase the movement's capacity" can get together with others who share their particular passion? (That's "b" and "c" above.)  How can we seek out among all these creative approaches ones that we are all interested in participating in, as we organize ourselves and the "movement" we are trying to inspire?  (That's "a" above.)  How can we set things up so that our initial organizing efforts are but the first flurry of an ongoing, self-organized co-evolution of FourYearsGo, not only in the next four years, but after 2014, as well?  (That's "d" above.)  

I offer a-d as one framing for organizing teams around capacity-building.  Those who have interest, knowledge, or skills in one or more of these areas can join others in exploring how their specialty might apply to FourYearsGo.

This article resonates with me. ChangeCamp Sault can be described in similar fashion: bring people together around the goals that matter to them, provide supports so they can interact and take responsibility for the change they want to see.

There is still much to figure out to make this model a reality. Next week, we'll explore how we as a community can support each other so that change at the grassroots is more than a rally cry. Event details: http://www.meetup.com/changesault/calendar/14064929/

Posted by Gerry Kirk 

Comments [0]

Get your session materials here [Session]

In case you didn't know, many of the session materials are tucked away on the Scrum Gathering web site:

http://www.scrumalliance.org/resources?tag=2010+Orlando+Gathering

Enjoy!

Filed under  //   materials   session   sgus  
Posted by Gerry Kirk 

Comments [0]

Acceptance Test Driven Development [Session]

Our industry has pretty much accepted the value of automated developer tests and the practice of TDD is slowly making its way into being a mainstream practice of craftsman programmers for ensuring code's correctness as well as aiding in its design. Similar benefits can be delivered with Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD), a test-driven approach to implementing product backlog items.

We begin with an introduction to the core ideas and rationale behind ATDD, creating a baseline for understanding what kind of benefits one might expect from adopting the practice and for recognizing the dynamic that enables those benefits.

We discuss common variations of ATDD, ranging from completely manual to a fully automated process with executable acceptance tests, and from a serial process to a parallelized process. Before opening the floor to questions, the presenter walks through an example scenario, illustrating what the discussed artifacts might look like in practice.

Click here to download:
Koskela_ATDD.pdf (2.25 MB)
(download)

Filed under  //   materials   session  
Posted by email 

Comments [0]

"Sneaky Scrum!" [Pecha Kucha] and "From AnyCo to AwesomeCo" [Experience Report]

"Sneaky Scrum!" is a PK selling a subversive system for stealthily sneaking Scrum into your organization.  It worked for me, and I'll show you how you can do it, too!

"From AnyCo to AwesomeCo" is an experience report, showing a troubled organization, how we transformed it using Scrum, and our awesome new powers.

See both presentations at http://kasperowski.com/2010/03/my-presentations-at-scrum-gathering.html .

(download)

Filed under  //   experience report   pecha kucha   sgus  
Posted by email 

Comments [0]

Materials My Big Scrum Adoption War Story [Session]

Click here to download:
ScrumGatherin10-Scrum@HP.pdf (467 KB)
(download)

Pastedgraphic-1

Filed under  //   materials   session  
Posted by email 

Comments [0]

Workshop notes for "Improve your communication through non-verbal rapport"

At Scrum Gathering Orlando, I ran an experiential workshop titled Improve your communication through non-verbal rapport. The session turned out really well so thanks to everyone who participated. My only tools were a flip chart and some markers, so the purpose of this post is to provide details for attendees as well as provide visibility to anyone interested in better communication.

Mehrabian Study

Amazingly, only 7% of communication is based on words while 38% is based on tonality and 55% on physiology.

The Mehrabian Study produced these numbers to quantify the importance of non-verbal communication.

 
 

 



You can read the full blog post here: http://www.agilitrix.com/2010/03/non-verbal-rapport/


Filed under  //   session   sgus  
Posted by email 

Comments [2]

PK - Cultures Galore! [Session]

Click here to download:
PK-Cultures Galore!.pdf (2.08 MB)
(download)

You can read a lot more about this here: http://tinyurl.com/ygps77n

Cheers,
Alan

Filed under  //   pecha kucha   session   sgus  
Posted by email 

Comments [0]

How to engage cynical teams in the ways of Scrum? [Open Space]

Initiator: Liza Wood

Participants (list names):  Scott Etzenhouser, Karen Oreaneo, Christine Quick, Don Skalak, Steve Schierholz, Elderclei Reami, Lasse Koskela, David Sheriff, Adnan Aziz, Richard Smith, Sherry DeSantis, Brent Weech, James Love, Ivy Armagust, Eric Cussen, Monica Williams, Sandra Hinrichs, Roni Givati, Rowan Bunning, Maria Galloway

Major points from your discussion: 

Symptoms of Cynicism:

  • Wait & see attitude/waiting for it to fail

  • Sabotagers

  • Name callers

  • Passive aggressive behaviour

  • Previously failed roll out (“I’ve seen this before and it didn’t work”)

  • Personality incompatible with Scrum

  • General negativity

  • Ego/Rockstar

  • Whining for the sake of whining/fixing issues is some else’s responsibility

  • Slacker (get exposed)

  • Lack of confidence or imposters

  • Non-participation

  • Afraid of change / comfortable the way things are

  • It’s not the way it works here”

Read the rest of this post »

Filed under  //   open space   os-session   sgus  
Posted by email 

Comments [1]

How the Pragmatic Product Management Framework Helps Product Owners [Session]

Click here to download:
scrum gathering product management.pdf (15.01 MB)
(download)

by Scott Dunn

Filed under  //   session  
Posted by email 

Comments [0]